122
Bioinformatics of the Brain
skull is the outcome of the pixel subtraction processes. Dandıl [9] proposed a
skull stripping algorithm that includes morphological operations like erosion,
dilation and filling. In addition, the study conducted a comparative analysis
with Otsu’s method to showcase the efficacy of the suggested skull-stripping
method. Roy and Maji [29] presented a novel intensity-based algorithm for
skull stripping. The steps of the algorithm include adaptively calculating the
threshold value and using morphological operations such as opening and clos-
ing. The authors compared the results of the algorithm to those of other widely
used skull-stripping tools, such as BET, BSE, and ROBEX. The results of the
experiment demonstrated that the proposed method can be utilized for syn-
thetic as well as real images. Reddy et al. [18] distinguished and removed the
skull regions of the brain based on opening and closing morphological opera-
tions. Duarte et al. [30] suggested a paradigm for brain extraction, consisting of
data collection, preprocessing, and extraction of the largest connected compo-
nent, in which they utilized digital image processing approaches at each stage.
The purpose of the preprocessing stage was to improve contrast and remove
any potential noise from the T1-weighted MRI. The process of extracting the
largest connected component—the brain—from an image realized by identify-
ing its largest element and then using mathematical morphological operators
to take it out.
In a review study on skull extraction methods, Kalavathi and Prasath [31]
stated that although numerous approaches to skull stripping have been put
forth, the issue is still not thought to be fully resolved. Numerous systems
in the literature perform well on some datasets (T1-weighted images), but
when the study populations or acquisition settings are altered, they are unable
to yield results that are acceptable. Hence, studies that provide applicable
solutions to all the problems presented by skull stripping methods are one of
the demanding research areas in the field of brain tumor detection [31].
4.3.3
Segmentation
Image segmentation infers partitioning an image into separate regions accord-
ing to the characteristics of the pixels in order to reduce the complexity of
the image and make its analysis simpler. In this way, pixels with the same
characteristics on the image will be grouped together and the image will be
divided into subgroups or regions of the same type. Segmentation is utilized
in the simplest cases to distinguish objects from the background, therefore the
segmented image becomes a binary image containing only the foreground and
background [32].
Image segmentation criteria can be stated with the following mathematical
expressions [33]. The image R can be partitioned into n regions R1, R2, ..., Rn
such that:
1.
n
i=1 Ri = R
2.
Ri is a connected set, i = 1, 2, ..., n